Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | antoine cointe | 9-5 | None |
Esper Pixie | kazunarin | 7-5 | None |
Esper Pixie | dr4gun0v | 6-8 | None |
Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Midrange , Golgari Obliterator
Toxic Deluge ranks #3324 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 65%).
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Toxic Deluge is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 2.87 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Toxic Deluge has a win rate of 52.7%, making it 11.0% better than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Coldsteel Heart | Snow Artifact | 5 | 70.0% | 1 |
Languish | Sorcery | 5 | 65.0% | 2 |
Dark Petition | Sorcery | 6 | 64.0% | 2 |
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 11 | 62.0% | 2 |
Black Market Connections | Enchantment | 6 | 59.0% | 0 |
Collective Brutality | Sorcery | 11 | 57.9% | 2 |
Beseech the Queen | Sorcery | 6 | 57.7% | 2 |
Feed the Swarm | Sorcery | 9 | 57.0% | 1 |
Mind Stone | Artifact | 9 | 56.9% | 2 |
Emrakul, the Promised End | Legendary Creature — Eldrazi | 8 | 56.9% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Toxic Deluge than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collective Brutality | Sorcery | 2 | 8 | 77.1% | 53.8% | +23.3% |
Mind Stone | Artifact | 2 | 7 | 75.0% | 55.3% | +19.7% |
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 8 | 71.7% | 52.8% | +18.9% |
Emrakul, the Promised End | Legendary Creature — Eldrazi | 13 | 6 | 77.8% | 59.7% | +18.1% |
Animate Dead | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 5 | 73.3% | 55.7% | +17.6% |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 8 | 69.4% | 52.6% | +16.9% |
Dark Petition | Sorcery | 5 | 5 | 73.9% | 59.3% | +14.6% |
Expedition Map | Artifact | 1 | 6 | 67.9% | 53.6% | +14.2% |
Phyrexian Arena | Enchantment | 3 | 6 | 68.0% | 53.9% | +14.1% |
Dark Confidant | Creature — Human Wizard | 2 | 6 | 64.7% | 51.0% | +13.7% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | 26 | 1.4% | 37.6% |
Mono Black Demons | 10 | 5.2% | 58.8% |
Golgari Midrange | 7 | 0.8% | 48.9% |
Dimir Midrange | 6 | 0.3% | 29.5% |
Dimir Bounce | 5 | 0.9% | 19.8% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.